Images Of Light And Darkness I :: essays research papers

In his play, Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare weaves an immortal story. In spite of the fact that it is more than 400 years of age, Romeo and Juliet, is as fascinating today as it was at its initiation and my conjecture is that its intrigue lies in its topic. Shakepeare picked a topic that’s been known to cause heartburn and rest misfortune for a considerable length of time. But then, paying little mind to the ills related with it, it stays a subject of overall intrigue. What's more, that is just, love. My mom says that adoration is one of the most abused, misjudged words in the English language. After some time, I’ve asked companions what they thought â€Å"it† was. I’ve consistently got varying answers. It’s when he opens the entryway. It’s when she does the clothing. It’s that thing that causes madness. It doesn’t exist. It existed uniquely in the medieval times. It’s what everybody is chasing for and nobody can discover. Don't worry about it. Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (Tenth Edition) characterizes it as: 1. (1): in number love for another emerging from connection or individual ties. 2: warm connection, eagerness, or commitment. 3: unselfish faithful and benevolet worry to benefit another. 4: to flourish with. Profound experts state that affection is everything that matters. They likewise state so as to really know something, one must know it’s inverse. To know hot, one must experience cold. To know distress, one more likely than not known bliss. To adore, one must despise. (Or possibly come entirely accursed near it.) Without dimness, one can't value light. Educators of English state that the best essayists are the individuals who can â€Å"hook† their perusers. The individuals who can push a story forward. Separation and complexity. Partition and differentiation, they state. Grinding delivered by restricting powers makes extraordinary dramatization. Shakespeare is an incredible producer. In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare opens with an introduction that essentially plots the whole play. In the wake of end goal fourteen, the peruser isn’t required to keep perusing since he/she knows the result. Shakespeare has given the peruser the end. There truly is no motivation to peruse on. But they do. The peruser proceeds since Shakespeare was a virtuoso at making emotional strain. In Romeo and Juliet, he utilizes two fundamental vehicles to do as such. One is the subject of adoration (Romeo and Juliet) versus detest (The Montagues and the Capulets). The other is the topic of obscurity and light. For motivations behind this paper, I will take a gander at the utilization of light and dull symbolism as it is connected with the two fundamental characters, Romeo and Juliet.

Sherlock Holmes and Sigmund Freud free essay sample

In the excerp from the novel The Seven-Per-Cent Solution, Nicholas Meyer’s uncovers the genuine idea of the characters analyst Sherlock Holmes and the therapist Sigmund Freud. Albeit, both of the characters shared similitudes and contrasts in their expert techniques that they utilized in their profession, the two characters were both amazing figures that changed the mankind's history through their brightness in work. To begin with, there are numerous similitudes between the characters Sherlock Holmes and Sigmund Freud. For instance, both Holmes and Freud smoked tobacco ideally both attempted cocaine while it was legitimate during the nineteenth century. While, Holmes utilized funnel for an approach to escape from his issues, Freud smoked stogie for research and test. Both of the characters had deductive characters, and were virtuoso at their work. Through utilizing â€Å"logical reasoning† both could discover fast responses to most basic inquiries. The two characters had outlook that was unreasonably ahead for other people; for example, Holmes created criminal examination and legal methods that no other analyst utilized. So also, Freud extended and â€Å"effected the fields of brain research and psychiatry†¦moving the two fields from the dimness of laboratories†¦into light of well known awareness† shrewdly navigating the fields of medication. There are additionally a few different ways that Holmes and Freud were extraordinary, beginning with their countries. Holmes and Freud were from two distinct nations; Holmes was from England while Freud was from Vienna. Freud worked inside as he was Austrian nervous system specialist who dealt with his most compelling hypotheses. In contrast to Freud, Holmes worked outside as he did his criminologist work discovering hoodlums. Another significant distinction between these two characters was that Freud examined cocaine for inquire about while Holmes had seething cocaine dependence as his old fashioned companion, Dr. Watson watches his basic issue declares â€Å"all spotted and scarred with incalculable cut marks,† uncovering the tallness of Holmes’ insane dependence that his arm was loaded up with punctured imprints as a result of his incessant needle infusion. Additionally, it was Freud that needed to fix Holmes’ condition after Dr. Watson carried him to Vienna. The last contrast they shared was that Holmes had a frail trademark which was a consequence of his insane dependence on cocaine and abandoned his existence without fixing it, while Freud remained solid and went on with his life effectively in spite of being â€Å"alienated from decent clinical community,† in this manner Freud had a feeling of respect and didn’t let an emergency in his life influence him in a negative way while Holmes let cocaine rule over him. The two characters likewise utilized numerous expert strategies that were like one another. Above all else, both Holmes and Freud utilized observational strategies to discover answers to questions. Through watching, both Holmes and Freud could surmise rapidly into the subject. In the case when Holmes is brought to Freud’s house, he rapidly declares data about Freud’s life, Holmes tends to Freud as â€Å"married, have a feeling of respect, and appreciates playing a game of cards and perusing Shakespeare† by watching his examination room Holmes definitely thoroughly understands Freud. Perception was utilized by Freud when he watched Holmes condition of cocaine habit and construes from it that Holmes must had an awful youth issue that lead him to get dependent on cocaine. Besides, both Holmes and Freud utilize a style of thinking, which is understanding signs and subtleties so as to reveal insider facts. Freud realizes that Holmes experienced mental injury engaged with his family, that is affecting his present issues, and without a doubt weariness isn't the explanation behind Holmes’ cocaine use. Holmes utilizes thinking when he tells Freud doesnt license any house cleaner into his private investigation room clearly in light of the residue in Freuds study room. The last technique that both utilized was contextual investigation strategy that was logical examination of an individual or occasion. Holmes does utilizes contextual investigation technique so as to settle secrets and locate the genuine hoodlums, while Freud utilizes contextual investigation by breaking down examples and discovering foundations for a person’s conduct. Contextual investigation strategy utilized by both Holmes and Freud, exceeded expectations at carrying a more profound comprehension to complex issues through encounters and past research. Notwithstanding having comparative techniques, Holmes and Freud likewise had various methodologies in their work. Holmes utilized a strategy for utilizing blood designs so as to know where in the room the blood began, while Freud utilized subjects life history so as to know why somebody is carrying on the manner in which they are. Holmes utilized amplifying glasses while completely breaking down the occasions, interestingly Freud utilized his â€Å"pocket watch† which was utilized for trance particularly for cocaine addicts. In the scene when Freud guarantees that he can stop the impulse of Holmes cocaine dependence by rehearsing sleep induction on him, Holmes irately reacts by asking do you propose to make me bark like a canine and creep about down on the ground? Which shows that Holmes doesnt put stock in entrancing and thinks it is a kind of stunt utilized by jokesters. The third distinction in proficient strategies utilized by Holmes and Freud was that the two of them had various demographics, for instance Freud managed patients that were wiped out and had mental issues while working inside, interestingly Holmes managed discovering lawbreakers and worked outside. All in all, both Sherlock Holmes and Sigmund Freud can be thoroughly analyzed in Nicholas Meyers The Seven-Per-Cent Solution as the two of them shook the establishment of human certainty. In spite of the fact that, Holmes and Freud didn’t partake in a similar field, they had numerous ways that they were comparable and their methods frequently coordinated with one another. Holmes rehearsed a method of criminologist work which was in front of every single other analyst, and Freud really turned around run of the mill mind accept and human speculations. These two marvelous figures were the most unique masterminds in their field, and changed history with their amazing strategies and thoughts.

Mind sports Essay Example For Students

Psyche sports Essay It appears to be practically similar to an ironic expression to join the words psyche and game particularly when the game viable is chess. It is hard to picture the game as a game when the most physical action it appears to require is moving the pieces no matter how you look at it. As of late, however, the Olympic advisory group casted a ballot chess lawful for rivalry in The Games. This affirmation of chess as a game by such a high chamber expects us to reevaluate our perspective on chess and games. In spite of the fact that chess doesn't seem to require as much movement as most unmistakable games, it requires so a lot, if not more, readiness and time. An investigation done at Temple University found that chess channels vitality at a rate that looks at to football. The absolute best chess players in history viewed athletic preparing as a basic piece of achievement in the game. Both Bobby Fischer and Garry Kasparov lifted loads. They utilized other physical molding procedures also, n ot really for their wellbeing, but since of the measure of endurance the game requires at significant levels of rivalry. It isn't remarkable for an expert player to lose 10 to 15 pounds throughout a match. Matches can keep going up to a month, with one game each day, eight hours each. More than 120 nations authoritatively look at chess as a game. The Unites States isn't one of them. That might be on the grounds that we appear to have an extremely biased perspective on what precisely a game is. Inquire as to whether chess ought to be viewed as a game, and the most probable reaction will be crazy chuckling, yet a bigger number of individuals play chess seriously than some other game on the planet, and a larger number of books have been distributed on chess than some other subject. The greater part of those players and creators immovably accept that chess is more diligently to be acceptable at than some other game or game. The idea of chess as a game likely just never happened to a great many people. Playing in a chess competition is similar to stepping through an exam that has not been read for yet that will choose something significant, then again, actually chess likewise has the additional issue of time. Envision taking that test with a period limit, similar to the SATs for instance, yet that the clock that is keeping the time radiates a black out ticking sound. In a huge room that is totally quiet the main thing perceptible will be that commotion, it is incredibly frightening for any unpracticed competition player. It has additionally been known to drive a few experts to the verge of madness.Most individuals who don't think about chess as a game either dont play, or are only uninformed of the realities. It is difficult to see exactly how troublesome the game truly is if competition play has never been experienced. To numerous individuals chess will never be viewed as a game, yet regardless of whether they did, it would in all probability not change the ordinarily held perspec tive on chess players, that of geeks and untouchables with nothing better to do.

Consent to Destruction the Phases of Fraternity and Separation in Animal Farm - Literature Essay Samples

Within George Orwell’s simple allegory Animal Farm lie lessons about the complex bonds between leadership, fraternity, and self-agency. The animals are at first subjugated by humans in a communal voiceless suffering, but Old Major inspires them to mobilize their powerful fraternity for their own good. However, the readers cringe as the originally successful revolution becomes increasingly thwarted; first, the intelligent pigs take over; then, the government devolves into a military dictatorship which destroys the original fraternity by creating a schism between the pigs and the other animals. Though the working animals are separated from their leaders, once again they find comfort in a frightened togetherness. Thus, each phase of the revolution is a step in a cycle of unity and separation. However the cycle is imperfect since as the story closes, the animals are stranded, unable to act for themselves in the face of Squealer’s rhetoric; the power in their frightened unit y can only be exploited by the pigs who, separated into a different category, do not have their interests at heart. The tragedy of the revolution is not simply that the pigs become even crueler oppressors than original man, but that at each step towards tyranny, it is the working animals themselves who are persuaded to give up their agency and consent to the increasingly terrorizing leadership. The animals first find their power in a visceral sense of brotherhood against humanity inspired by Old Major. Old Major divides the world into men and animals: â€Å"All men are enemies. All animals are comrades†¦Weak or strong, clever or simple, we are all brothers† (31). Despite their physical differences, all animals find something stirring in their anthem, Beasts of England. â€Å"The cows lowed it, the dogs whined it, the sheep bleated it, the horses whinnied it, the ducks quacked it†(34). Though each animal is irreconcilably different, they can all raise their voice s to sing the same song of hope. Their power to overthrow men is derived from this awareness of themselves as animals, the antihumans. This collective sense also propels the animals through the incipient stages of their self-government after the revolution, and it is a version of what literary critic V.C. Letemendia calls â€Å"innate decency† (119). Their first harvest is the biggest in history not only because each animal works honestly hard, but also because â€Å"not an animal on the farm had stolen so much as a mouthful† during the harvest (46). The new government is stable because â€Å"Nobody stole, nobody grumbled over his rations†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (47) and the animals’ â€Å"decency† is generally reliable, with only a few exceptions like Mollie the vain mare and the never-present cat. The new government works swimmingly because, as Letemendia notes, the worker animals’ decency â€Å"provided them with an instinctive feeling of what a fair society might actually look like† (120). The majority of the animals do not crave power â€Å"for any personal gain† (120)—at least, not yet. The fraternity is still the overriding social force. However, their revolution and hardship contains the genesis of a new conflict. In addition to unity, concrete animal leadership is also required to benefit from their own immense power. That very leadership generates a schism between the leaders and the led. Right from the beginning, the â€Å"work of teaching and organizing the others fell naturally upon the pigs, who were generally recognized as being the cleverest of the animals†(35). They expand Old Major’s ideas into a complete system of thought called Animalism, which emphasizes freedom from human oppressors and whose central tenets are summarized into seven commandments that oppose to all human characteristics. Thus, the pigs constantly inflame the animals’ anger and awareness of exploitation, which is essential overthrow of the humans. However, the pigs are â€Å"generally recognized† as cleverer; a distinction grows right from the start between the pigs and the rest of the animals. There is no competition; the pigs are â€Å"naturally† cleverer; they simply assume control and the unity of all the animals begins to fragment. Indeed, as the regime progresses, the original animal brotherhood deteriorates further. After Napoleon takes over, the animals do not â€Å"sit all together as they had done in the past. Napoleon, with Squealer and another pig named Minimus†¦sat on the front of the raised platform, with the nine young dogs forming a semicircle round them, and the other pigs sitting behind. The rest of the animals sat facing them in the main body of the barn† (70-71). Already, the pigs and the dogs are divided from the rest of the animals; two groups sit facing each other in a strong aura of opposition. After awhile, the division is so sever e that only the pigs themselves really know what the pigs are doing. They move into the farmhouse, further segregating themselves from the working animals who can rely only on rumors and hearsay to discern whether the pigs are sleeping in beds. Time passes, and Napoleon is even elevated to quasi-godhood. He is so much of a leader, so different from the rest, that his food must be tasted and dogs must guard him day and night. He is so separated that he almost never appears in public and has Squealer speak for him. Thus, out of the original sense of brotherhood has grown a horrific chasm that divides the new leadership from the rest. We then appear to have returned to the miserable beginning with this new schism. Again, the oppressed find a fraternity in oppression: a union that may perhaps lead to another revolution. Just after Napoleon’s first violent executions, the animals, â€Å"except for the pigs and dogs,† instinctively creep away to brood â€Å"in a body†(93). As they are all â€Å"huddling together for warmth†(94), they tacitly share their shock and dismay over the bloodshed they have witnessed. This new fellowship is rooted in a wordless psychological rapport, much like the original sense of fraternity. One might be able to argue that since the animals are, at least physically speaking, in the same oppressed situation as they had been at the beginning of the book, another revolution might occur and the cycle might begin again. After all, they are in the perfect position for another leader to rise from among them, inflame their emotions and make them aware of their new oppression and its needlessness. True, once again the necessity of leadership might yet lead to another failed revolution; yet, a revolution might be possible nonetheless. If we return to Letemendia’s argument that the animals possess an â€Å"innate decency,† however, we can see that the animals are not quite in the same position as before; m oreover, as long as that â€Å"innate decency† prevents them from comprehending â€Å"the true nature of the pigs† (120), they cannot tap their new potential power in unity. After the slaughter, Boxer still concludes that â€Å"It must be due to some fault in ourselves†(94); he cannot blame the pigs because his decency prevents him from recognizing that the pigs are not included in the fellowship of decent creatures: something of a paradox. Though Boxer is widely respected and admired for his tremendous working capabilities, even he cannot lead the animals to a possibly better future. In Clover’s mind, too, there is still â€Å"no thought of rebellion or disobedience†(95); she still â€Å"would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of Napoleon†(95). Though she feels the disillusionment keenly, she cannot express her feelings because she simply cannot comprehend why the picture is w rong. Hampered by their naive â€Å"innate decency,† the working animals are unable to translate their general disillusionment into action to correct the shortcomings of their government. Not only does their â€Å"innate decency† prevent them from recognizing the evil in their leaders, it is even exploited by Squealer until their oppression becomes consensual. Each time the pigs do something questionable, whether it is taking the milk and apples, resolving to trade with humans, or moving into the farmhouse, there is first a promising murmur of protest. However, though â€Å"some of the other animals murmured, it was no use†(52); that glimmer of self-agency dies as soon as Squealer delivers his rhetoric. For example, the animals blithely swallow Squealer’s statement that most pigs â€Å"actually dislike milk and apples†¦Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health†(52), because being unselfish themselves, they cannot imagin e others being selfish. They have technically consented to the beginnings of injustice. When Napoleon wants to initiate trade with the humans, even though the animals question themselves—â€Å"never to have any dealings with human beings, never to engage in trade, never to make use of money—had not these been among the earliest resolutions passed?† (76)— Squealer exploits the lack of written records to ease their doubts until all animals are â€Å"satisfied†(77) and consenting. Any sparks of self-agency are mellowed into satisfaction. In his most significant speech, Squealer addresses the issue of agency and autonomy. He convinces the animals that only Napoleon can make the decisions, because they â€Å"might make the wrong decisions† for themselves (69). He paints leadership as â€Å"a deep and heavy responsibility†(69) rather than a place of privilege and power. Again, the animals are duped into believing the unselfish motives Squea ler depicts because their naà ¯ve decency prevents them from knowing better. Thus, the â€Å"general feeling† becomes â€Å"If Comrade Napoleon says it, it must be right† (70); they have consented to the hijacking of their ability to act for themselves. The pigs essentially manipulate the animals’ decency to extract from them a monstrous consent to their exploitation, thereby robbing the animals of all self-agency and ability to better themselves. Thus, though â€Å"innate decency† might have caused the animals’ initial fraternal success, it also brings upon their later inability to act for themselves. One is tempted to speculate that if only the animals were less passive and more ambitious their society might have failed less spectacularly. However, some of the pigs lack the problematic â€Å"innate decency† and do have the ambition which propels them to act for themselves. Ironically, within the homogeneous species of pigs there is more d angerous violence than there is between the diverse working animals. Obviously we see that Napoleon ruthlessly kills to consolidate his power and shamelessly lies through Squealer to keep his honored position. Right from the beginning there is conflict between Snowball and Napoleon. They cannot agree on whether to export the revolution to other farms or whether to shore up their own defenses. They constantly squabble over the windmill, and their enmity culminates in a military coup: Napoleon calls up his secretly reared dogs and violently expels Snowball from the farm. Even after that, the constant drive to secure his hard-won power pushes Napoleon to eliminate opposition from within his own ranks as well; his dogs savagely rip to pieces â€Å"the same four pigs as had protested when Napoleon abolished the Sunday Meetings† (92). Even the pigs, who might have a chance to fulfill aspirations to power, live in a world. The ambition that governs the pigs does not ensure their hap piness or survival any more than the â€Å"innate decency† of the working animals. Society can be based on neither characteristic; the animals have a â€Å"decent† fraternity but are exploited; the pigs have self-agency but live in a dangerous culture of ruthless ambition. There are several tragedies in Animal Farm, then. One belongs to the working animals; their tragedy we can hardly bear to witness is the desecration of decency, consent, and self-agency. One of the final impressions of the animals we have is their irrepressible, utterly misguided hope. In the final chapter when life before revolution is almost less than a memory, they secretly hum their inspirational anthem of yore. They are convinced that though it â€Å"might be that their lives were hard and that not all of their hopes had been fulfilled†¦they were not as other animals†¦All animals were equal†(131). Though they live and work and feel together in a potentially powerful union, thei r naà ¯ve decency ensures their consent to their own destruction. The other tragedy belongs to the revolution and construction of society in Animal Farm at large. Even if the animals had the self-agency to revolt, the inevitable necessity for leadership would merely bring them along the same path of betrayal; if they had ambition instead of decency, they would be no better off. In the end there is little hope for permanent betterment of Animal Farm. Works Cited Letemendia, V.C.. â€Å"Revolution on Animal Farm: Orwell’s Neglected Commentary.† Modern Critical Interpretations: Animal Farm, ed. Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1999. 119-129. Orwell, George. Animal Farm. New York: Penguin Books USA Inc., 1996.

The PA and Supervising Physician Relationship 5 Must Haves!

Over my 15 years + as a PA I have had been lucky to work with some incredible physicians. Physicians who get what I do, treat me like a colleague and understand my utility (both to my patients and to the practice). The best working relationships are the same as those that make a great marriage: They include a large dose of mutual respect, patience, presence, and appreciation. Here are 5 Must-Haves for a Successful PA and Supervising Physician Relationship 1. A Willing Mentor and a Willing Apprentice I place this as number one because I think it really is the most important, especially if you are a new PA. Feeling comfortable with your supervisor has the potential to save lives. The majority of medical errors I see PAs make (rare as they may be) are usually a result of making decisions that you arent comfortable with. Having a good working relationship with your supervisor, one that is open to ALL questions will give you the security you need to do your job well. Now that I have been practicing for several years it is not uncommon to find myself in a position to help many of our new doctors. I always am impressed when the doctors are willing to hear my thoughts as well. It is a two-way street. 2. A Mutual Understanding of What You Can and Cannot do It is a good idea to sit down together and discuss your strength's and weaknesses. Dont be afraid, to be honest. Yes, you may be embarrassed that you just accepted this new family practice job and you have never really done a pelvic exam on a real patient (my situation). But that is OK. If you are honest about these things and you dont try to act as you know it all you will learn how to do things right. It may take a few attempts and again that is ok. But if your supervisor understands where you are coming from this will make all the difference 3. Patience...Lots of it This was a hard one for me. It is inevitable that some of your most complicated patients will arrive on your busiest days. Your rooms are full, you are an hour behind and you just want an answer: STAT minus the teaching moment. But the best teachers are also the ones who understand the value of a teaching moment. Waiting to get an answer to your question may be the number one deterrent to asking a question. But I will encourage you to dig deep and have patience. I can remember these moments (and there were lots of them) but it was always worth it. I learned something that I now probably use every day. 4. Availability When started my first job I was required to work Saturday clinics. This wouldnt have been bad except for the fact that I was alone. As a new physician assistant, this is a tough situation and one that can be anxiety provoking. The only thing that made this tolerable was knowing that somebody had my back. Unfortunately, this was not always the case. Make sure that you work this out with your supervisor and if you are new it is important that they are not just available by phone but that they are actually available when you need them most. Nothing is worse than that dial tone when you really need a helping hand. 5. Honest (and supportive) Feedback The best supervisors can give good constructive criticism but also know how and when to give you a pat on the back from time to time. I love critical analysis of my work, it makes me a better physician assistant. But when that is all you get it can become demoralizing. On the opposite side of that coin is the supervisor who thinks everything you do is pitch perfect. In this case, you may feel good but there will be no growth in your work. Having a supervising physician that is present, kindly critical and has a desire to see the best for your patients is a perfect world! What if you are not getting what you need? This is a good question and needs to be addressed. If you are working in a toxic environment you need to let someone know. If this toxic environment is your employer then it may be time to start looking for a new job. There is no shame in this you have worked hard to earn your degree, you are smart and capable dont let a bad working environment shape your (or your patient's) future. You may also like -The Physician Assistant and the Frog: Kiss Many a Frog Before you Marry a ToadEvery night before bed my wife and I take time as a family to read to our kids. I love fairy tales as teaching tools. I particular love the story of the princess who had to kiss a frog in order to find her handsome prince. There []Your Main Goal on Your Path to PA Shouldnt be Immediate Success or Money, But to Learn as Much as PossibleYour primary goal as a new physician assistant or as someone hoping to become one should not be immediate success or money, but to learn as much as possible. When people look for a way in to a particular field an internship or first []Haiti Medical Mission Trip: Settling In, Resetting my Clock and Resetting my World ViewThis post is the third of a series about working as a physician assistant in Haiti. Growth happens at times when we are the most challenged And yes this almost always involves overcoming fear. There is no better way to travel than []

The Benefits of Independent Finanical Audit Stakeholders

What are the benefits of an independent financial statement audit stakeholders? To understand and answer that question, the word audit has to be defined. Based on the IRS, an audit is a review or examination of an organization or individuals accounts and financial information to ensure information is being reported correctly to verify the amount of tax reported is accurate. From Wikipedia, the audit of financial statements is the verification of the financial statements of a legal entity, with a view to express an audit opinion. There are many types and components to an audit. To understand the question that was first stated at the beginning of the introduction, the role of an audit and auditor has to be explained. As well as the beneficiaries of audit must be known, who the stakeholders of an audit are and how they benefit, the stakeholders expectations, the consequences of not having an audit, the auditing process, and auditor’s independence. The sole of this paper is to un derstand what the benefits of independent financial audit stakeholders are. To start off, the definition of an audit was explained in the introduction, but there also are different types of audits and many components to an audit. One type of audit is an external audit, which can be known as a financial audit and statutory audit. It involves the examination of the truth and fairness of the financial statements of an entity by an external auditor who is independent of the organization in accordanceShow MoreRelatedThe Role Of Auditing Standards On The Agency Theory And Review Common Benefits1291 Words   |  6 Pagesabout the collapse of HIH insurance from five articles. Secondly, it discusses and highlights some ethical issues, stakeholders including the relationships between HIH directors and its auditing team, and outlines their financial and non-financial problems around HIH’s stakeholders. This report also analyze HIH’s auditing issues applying on the agency theory and review common benefits with the role of an auditing firm – Arthur Anderson in HIH’S collapse. HIH was the second largest insurance company

The Black Race By John Brown - 1234 Words

transforms his own slave narrative into a novel about a phenotypically white slave woman. This adds great meaning to mixed race individuals throughout the text because a white female will ultimately be the symbol of liberty for slaves. For instance, Clotel is the daughter of Jefferson, and is still not able to be liberated from the inevitable fate that black slaves faced. She was sold into slavery, even though she resembled the white race more than the black race. Brown depicts his racial mixture in Clotel by highlighting the struggle these individuals faced, along with adding a hint of personal experiences. At the end of the novel, Brown states, â€Å"My narrative has now come to a close. I may be asked, and no doubt shall, Are the various incidents and scenes related founded in truth? I answer, Yes. I have personally participated in many of those scenes† (Brown). Brown himself was mulatto who had been through a lot in his life. He was born into a divided home and as a resu lt he suffered all throughout his life. He was a slave that was persecuted out of the country. In Clotel, Brown fictionalizes the story of Thomas Jefferson to portray a sense of justice towards mulattos. Jefferson was the President of the Untied States, someone who was known to be the author of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independent states, â€Å"We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created free and equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certainShow MoreRelatedEssay about Jim Crow Laws in the United States1460 Words   |  6 Pagesbecause of their skin color, sex, race, etc. Social classes and slavery are just two examples of discrimination. Even though our Constitution is based on freedom, our own Constitution allowed for discrimination of African Americans for around 100 years. It allowed White people to harass Black people. If we base our country on giving freedom to everybody, shouldn?t it include everyone? Discriminat ion against Blacks was called Jim Crow laws. The laws made sure Blacks and Whites had limited contact,Read MoreJohn Brown s A Hero935 Words   |  4 PagesJohn Brown Essay What John Brown did was crazy and was suicidal; he did it because he knew the purpose of it and the after effect of it. After the Harpers Ferry revolt Brown said that he doesn’t feel no guilt for his actions. He knew what people would characterize him as and he just doesn’t care. He knows what affect and toll it would take on people to see their own kind to stand up and fight for equality of a different race. Most people would think he’s crazy, but actually he’s just trying toRead MoreJohn Brown And Abraham Lincoln Chapter 6 Summary1228 Words   |  5 PagesChapter 6, John Brown and Abraham Lincoln (pg. 172-203) America political life was completely mindless Frances FitzGerald observed in her survey of American history books in 1979 The opposite of racism in anti-racism or equalitarianism but it isnt clear if it will prevail; history books underplay white racism while neglecting racial idealism The language in history books are highly objective as one mans stalk is anothers walk; bias also plays a part as certain details are omitted John BrownRead MoreFinal Paper. Ashton L Young. College Of Charleston . .1223 Words   |  5 Pagesequality of education post Brown v. Board of education (1954). I will discuss the challenges of desegregation, what challenges minority students still face in America s public schools post Brown v. Board, and how might we transform education so that all students receive equal opportunity according to Dewey and Paolo. Education Post Brown v. Board Brown versus the Board of Education set the precedent for schooling in America with the ideals of equal education to all, no matter race or ethnicity. WithRead MoreJim Crow Laws Essay1593 Words   |  7 PagesRacism has existed in America for centuries. The relations between Whites and Blacks first began in 1696 when a Dutch ship brought twenty slaves into Virginia. Their origins of enslaving the Blacks led to white people believing they were the superior race. Slavery was abolished when the Civil War ended in 1865, but black people still did not receive equal treatment. This struggle for equality was caused by a legislation called the Jim Crow laws, which prohibited African Americans from using the sameRead More Plessy vs. Ferguson Essay examples1263 Words   |  6 Pagessegregation between blacks and whites already existed in most schools, restaurants, and other public facilities in the American South. In the Plessy decision, the Supreme Court ruled that such segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This amendment provides equal protection of the law to all U.S. citizens, regardless of race. The court ruled in Plessy that racial segregation was legal as long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were â€Å"equalRead MoreWhat Is The Difference Between Plessy Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. Bored Of Education1130 Words   |  5 PagesHolt Law 7 October 2017 Segregation in the U.S Segregation is the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment. During segregation people of different races had to ride in different rail cars and attended separate schools. In two cases, Plessy V. Ferguson and Brown V. Bored of Education, the Fourteenth Amendment was argued. The outcome of these two court cases effected African Americans and their fight against segregation. These two court case are similarRead MoreThe Case Of Plessy V. Ferguson1072 Words   |  5 Pages Segregation is the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment. During segregation people of different races had to ride in different rail cars and attended separate schools. In two cases, Plessy V. Ferguson and Brown V. Bored of Education, the Fourteenth Amendment was argued. The outcome of these two court cases effected African Americans and their fight against segregation. These two court case are similar in their fight for a cause because they challengedRead MoreRacism During The Civil Rights Era1562 Words   |  7 PagesMakenna Johnson Mrs. Walker English 10 23 February 17 Racism in Children The time of racism, segregation, and discrimination in the Civil Rights era was a difficult time for many people: whites, other races, and even children. Racism brought the realization to many people to think about how racism might affect their children and the way they were brought up. The real interesting fact is, that even though most Americans showed concern towards children there wasn t a large percentage thatRead MoreRacial Tensions Between Colored Americans And White Americans1459 Words   |  6 Pagesready to fight for change. Although the civil rights movement was supported mostly by the colored Americans, many white Americans were also ready for change. The interpretation of the civil rights era was modeled by the Brown vs. Board of education case, the imperative speech by John F. Kennedy, and the student non-violent coordinating committee proposal. In June 1892, the Plessy v. Ferguson case established the â€Å"separate but equal† frame for America and called it constitutional. The entire case